You Might Also Like


  • Reply Lisa E. March 8, 2016 at 8:17 pm

    If you have nothing and you do nothing, then I suppose this looks like a big something. Great that it is a “passive” home, but it looks like it was built in a slum area and I don’t find that appealing at all.

    • Reply Bridget O'Connor March 20, 2016 at 8:40 pm

      That is not a bad neighborhood at all. You wouldn’t have all the glass and you would put bars on the windows so no one would crawl in. It is not for everyone because of the multiple floors; however. it certainly is a great use of space!

  • Reply Putty March 9, 2016 at 12:59 am

    Slicey, dicey… I like the planes and panes of glass, light, angles, the peek-a-boo play of walls and levels wedging itself into the neighborhood like a young sapling with “an inch of space here and a breath of life there…all without breaking…anything” truly… “SPRING” is like a perhaps hand in a window”.

  • Reply MJ March 10, 2016 at 12:25 am

    It may be a small slice of a house, but it beats the crap out of the houses on either side of it!

  • Reply E. A. Foster March 20, 2016 at 9:41 pm

    amazing design and use of space. In places like Vancouver, B.C. where a tear down goes for over 2 million, this type of house is great. That tear down’s lot will be 33 or 44 ft. frontage.

    This type of home invigorates urban areas. Japan also has some great homes on very tiny lots. With homes like this and a roof top space, you are set for life. Loved it.

  • Reply Seth March 22, 2016 at 7:29 pm

    I do find it kind of attractive and interesting inside, somehow. It looks like a house more than a home, however. Too sterile. Nothing personable about it.

  • Leave a Reply

    Reassure separated recommended recently commonplace internal stared term