You Might Also Like


  • Reply Nerida February 5, 2015 at 11:33 pm

    Truckee, here I come!

  • Reply Sally derevan February 7, 2015 at 3:38 am

    Gorgeous cabin with amazing views, however, it doesn’t look very small. How many square feet?

  • Reply william heath February 8, 2015 at 7:20 pm

    what is the price how do I contact seller

  • Reply Danielle Hogan February 9, 2015 at 2:23 am

    I am in LOVE with this cabin!! It is SO beautiful & cozy, yet it looks so spacious & open. I WANT IT!! (WAH!!)

  • Reply Robert February 12, 2015 at 5:40 am

    Again with the giant houses! Do you have an upper limit on square footage for a house to be featured here, or are you just advertising for whatever architects and builders decide to post here? If it’s over 1000 square feet, it’s not a small house. 750 square feet or less would represent a true small house.

    • Reply Ashley February 12, 2015 at 4:47 pm

      I’m curious; what, from these photographs, leads you to believe this is a “giant” house over 1000 square feet?

    • Reply Mary Jo February 17, 2015 at 7:45 pm

      I second that Robert. I live in a house that is 1000 square feet and even though it is small, 1000 sq. ft. is not part of the small house movement.

  • Reply Pat Boice February 12, 2015 at 7:55 pm

    I love this place. I still think 1000 sq ft can safely be called a small house – not tiny, but small. I do wish this site would always post the square footage.

  • Reply Brad February 17, 2015 at 3:09 am

    This place is over 3,500sf

  • Reply Trix February 18, 2015 at 9:37 am

    I hate to be all “you Americans”, because it’s the Aussies as well, but in no way can this be called a “small house”.

  • Reply Bob February 19, 2015 at 3:40 am

    This home is 3,250 sq ft, why is it on here? Yours for the modest sum of $3,5 million!

  • Reply Sara Mushtaq February 19, 2015 at 8:33 am

    Wow beautiful in a very peaceful environment. I love it really wanna to go out there and spend my holidays out there.

  • Reply michelle February 24, 2015 at 5:32 pm

    yes there are enough sites out there with conventional “small houses” featured,
    Please submit ones such as this cabin to them and focus on TINY DWELLINGS here, for us please.

    appreciated much,

  • Reply Montana Hellcat March 7, 2015 at 9:03 pm

    Weeellll..I was oooh’ing and ahhhh’ing, looking at the pics of this house, thinking thats probably one of the prettiest houses I have ever seen, till I scrolled down to the comments….

    Then, lo and behold, in typical internet fashion, here is a snarling, smart mouthed, jackass that thinks they have a “right” to complain about what someone posts on their website?? Does anyone else get sick of this kind of thing????

    • Reply Kathy Z July 15, 2015 at 3:44 pm

      Yes, yes we do. 🙁

  • Reply Jill March 13, 2015 at 7:05 pm

    I don’t care how many square feet it is…I want it!!

  • Reply ahşap küpeşte May 6, 2016 at 6:34 am

    I am in LOVE with this cabin!! It is SO beautiful & cozy, yet it looks so spacious & open. I WANT IT!! (WAH!!)

  • Reply Via B Design September 7, 2016 at 12:46 am

    Love the kitchen in this house!

  • Reply Filipe Nunes September 30, 2016 at 3:37 pm

    AMAZING!! love it!”!!

  • Reply Flexographics January 13, 2017 at 1:54 pm

    Love it! I’ve been dying to live in the mountains

  • Reply leilani January 17, 2017 at 9:27 pm

    I get irked by the obnoxious tiny house cultists who insist that everyone else must rigidly subscribe to their fundamentalist interpretations of “allowable” size as much as the next person, but yah, even I’d say it’s stretching the concept to call a $3.5 million house with 3250 interior sf & 897 exterior plus a 740 sf garage a small house.

    Nonetheless, the front elevation as its pictured here could inspire some very snazzy styling for a small house. Just don’t look at the expansive side elevation & ignore the generous floor plan, both depicted elsewhere online.

    There are design lessons for all of us everywhere & it’s a big mistake for tiny/downsizing enthusiasts to ignore opportunities for gleaning inspiration from any buildings that don’t meet the exacting specs for their ideal footprint.

    Plus, given the behemothic proportions that some of the more typically extravagant “cabins” can reach at Martis Camp, the post & beam beauty posted here is actually rather modest, so in that sense it *is* small.

    Everything’s relative, and this mountain home is so nicely executed (architecture by Walton A+E in Tahoe City CA, btw) we can appreciate its thoughtful restraint within its chi-chi context.

  • Leave a Reply

    Reassure separated recommended recently commonplace internal stared term